Prospective MEPs 2014
Your chance to tell us where you stand
The Vegan Society is the first and
oldest vegan organisation in the world, representing tens of thousands
of EU voters. Our supporters are very interested to hear your views
and your party’s policies in the following issues. Please forward
your responses by email to Amanda Baker on policy@vegansociety.com so
we can share with them as they prepare to vote for Europe.
Human rights: The Charter of Fundamental
Rights of the European Union, Article 10
‘Freedom of thought, conscience and religion’ gives the right to
manifest our vegan philosophical beliefs, in teaching and practice,
and Article 21 ‘Non-discrimination’ prohibits discrimination against
vegans. How do your party’s policies develop practical protection
of these rights - including vegans in institutional settings e.g. children
in schools, patients in hospitals, people in justice systems, workers
and others?
One of our party's key policies is to
promote healthy plant-based diets because we believe healthy, plant
based diets are better for human health, the environment and of course,
animal welfare. All of our Committee of National Officers, 7 of our
8 candidates for the London Region in the EU elections and many of our
members and supporters are vegan. Therefore this is an issue that is
of extreme importance to us.
On page 53 of our manifesto we draw attention
to the following:
Veganism has been a protected belief
since 1993, as a human right under Article 9 of the European Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights. Animal Welfare Party
will strive for this right to be respected within the UK and across
the EU.
On page 38 of our manifesto we draw attention
to the following:
Protecting
Human Health
Good health should be
viewed as one of our most valuable assets. In an era of rising levels
of obesity and preventable diseases including cancer, heart disease
and diabetes, Animal Welfare Party believes that the promotion of healthy,
plant-based diets, which are also low in alcohol, refined sugars and
trans fats must be viewed as the foundation of good health policy. In
addition we believe that exercise must be promoted.
Across Europe, we believe
that there is much scope for those dispensing advice on diet – medical,
nursing and education professionals to update their knowledge on the
value of plant-based nutrition and for European citizens to reap the
benefits of being better informed on what constitutes a healthy diet.
Plant-centred diets - at least seven
portions of vegetables and fruit daily - have great public health impact,
cutting premature death by over 40% (Oyebode et. al 2014). What are
your party’s policies on :
Promoting plant-centred diets for
public health?
Monitoring and reporting on the public
health effectiveness of Member State plant-centred nutrition strategies
compared to EU and world best practice?
Research and support for the transition
to sustainable plant-based protein production and human consumption,
away from animal protein.
Animal Welfare Party's long term vision
is of a Europe that has completely ended its dependence on animal products
because we have come to understand the devastating effects that such
dependence has upon the environment, human health and animal welfare.
We would like to see EU subsidies of
livestock and fisheries farming (currently averaging 50 billion euros
per year) re-directed into into plant-based agriculture.
We would like to see healthy plant-based
eating promoted through public health and education campaigns across
Europe. We also believe that wherever public funds are spent on the
promotion, purchase or subsidy of foodstuffs, for example to provide
meals for those in schools, hospitals, the armed forces or government
workplaces, this should be limited to healthy, plant-based foodstuffs.
The following extract from Page 9 of
our EU Parliament manifesto may be of interest.
Food
No
food wastage
Worldwide there is more
than enough food cultivated to feed the growing world population, but
too much is being wasted. If we want to fairly share resources, we have
to eat less animal and more plant products. Such a shift is imperative
in terms of global food security but it would also bring huge benefits
for our own health, reducing pressure on our national health systems,
nature and the environment.
- By far the largest and most
irresponsible type of food wastage is the feeding of animals with food
that can also be eaten by humans. Grains, soya and vegetable oils should
not be used as a raw material for the livestock industry.
- The Animal Welfare Party believes
Europe should end the illusion that the production of meat and dairy
products has minimal costs. Until we have ended our dependence upon
such products, cut-price special offers on meat should disappear, and
a fair price be paid for milk and eggs.
- In accordance with the 'polluter
pays' principle the EU should reconsider its VAT Directive: a low rate
should be set for sustainable, healthy food and a high rate for products
that involve environmental burden, animal distress and contribute to
preventable disease
- Eating healthy and sustainably
starts at school. European school milk schemes should cease, and schemes
for healthy, plant-based meals should be extended, for which organic
and sustainable food should be purchased. Learning how to eat healthy
and sustainably should be included in the curriculum.
- The subsidy of millions of
euros that are currently spent on the promotion of animal products should
be ended immediately with the funds being re-directed into marketing
and promotion of plant products.
- National governments must
show leadership themselves, reducing public spending on the promotion
and consumption of foodstuffs that are known to be harmful to the environment
and / or human health – animal products, refined sugar, trans-fats,
palm oil from unsustainable or unknown sources
- At the same time national
governments must seek to both change consumer behaviour in order to
promote a healthy and sustainable world. Taxes on products containing
refined sugar, trans-fats, palm oil from unsustainable or unknown sources,
animal products (relative to CO2 equivalent) and alcohol should be increased.
- The EU should support the
establishment of industry bodies promoting the production and consumption
of healthy, plant-based foods
- The EU must increase funding
of research into and development of plant-based proteins.
- An EU Sub Committee of the
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee should be established
to promote best practice in plant-based food production.
- Food products must be labelled
clearly to allow consumers to make choices in line with their own principles
on the environment, health, animal welfare and the social circumstances
in which a product is produced. Many consumers are unaware of the reality
of how the food products they buy are produced and are shocked when
they find out the truth. Labels must, therefore, provide honest and
clear information on the above. For example, eggs and egg products which
involve the killing of new-born male chicks as part of the production
process must indicate this. Meat and poultry products obtained from
animals not stunned before slaughter must indicate this. Misleading
pictures such as laughing pigs on pork steaks and laughing cows on packets
of cheese must become a thing of the past.
- Private quality marks are
not a sufficient guarantee of sustainable food supply chains. The EU
must set strict sustainability criteria for palm oil, soya and biomass.
- Many European regulations
on best-before-dates and size and shape of fruit and vegetables are
too strict and encourage food wastage. These food regulations should
be changed. Citizens should be well informed of the shelf-life of food
and how to keep it, and, as a result, less food will end up in the bin.
- Europe should stimulate the
development of urban growing to show children and adults where food
actually comes from, to recover the connection between people and food
and to improve awareness of the costs and quality of food.
- To counter mass-produced products,
frequently manufactured outwith the EU, we would like to encourage more
traditional and local plant-based products. The EU will amend food regulations
that unnecessarily hinder the marketing of these products.
- The effort to achieve a more
sustainable food pattern requires a clear standard: plant-based food
should be the basis of a healthy, sustainable diet; animal proteins
should be the exception.
- Opinion leaders, influencers
and policy makers should walk the talk. Food served in the restaurants
of European institutions and at official dinners should be organic and
produced locally. As it would be irresponsible for public funds to be
spent on the consumption of foodstuffs that are known to be harmful
to the environment and/or human health, the food served should be free
of or include a minimum of animal products, refined sugar and trans-fats.
Climate change and Stock-free farming
Moving away from animal farming – to food, fuel and other crops for
direct human use – can significantly cut EU greenhouse gas emissions.
What are your party’s policies on supporting EU farmers who wish to
move toward horticulture, arable farming, agro-forestry and other crop
farming, away from the ‘livestock’ industry?
Animal Welfare Party
would like to see European agricultural policy thoroughly reformed.
In the interest of a sustainable future, we aim for a radical change
of policy into an ecological, animal-friendly agriculture that produces
healthy food and which is not dependent on imports at the expense of
people and animals abroad.
The world population
currently sits at around 7 billion, expected to rise to between 8 and
10 billion by 2050. To be able to feed everybody, now and in the future,
a reduction of livestock and a transition to a more plant-based food
pattern is inevitable.
We want to use the present
agricultural subsidies to help farmers to transition to sustainable
production systems with a fair price for a fair product. Ultimately,
the system of subsidies will cease to be necessary because a healthy
market will have been created.
CAP
spending on better agriculture
The CAP budget takes
up 38% of the total EU Budget for the next five years. The focus on
sustainability within the second pillar is clearly visible by the fact
that at least 30% of the budget of each Rural Development programme
must be reserved for voluntary measures that are beneficial for the
environment and climate change. These include agri–environmental,
climate measures, organic farming, Areas of Natural Constraints (ANC),
Natura 2000 areas, forestry measures and investments that are beneficial
for the environment or climate. Over 25 billion Euros over five years
will be available under Pillar 2 ‘Voluntary Measures’
- We suggest that this should
be spent on stock-free organic farming, agro-forestry and sustainable
educational recreation, in order to ensure farmers’ livelihoods well
into the future.
- CAP Pillars should be revised
post-2020 to reflect self-sustaining agricultural systems.
- We should reduce the overall
CAP budget post-2020 so that funds can be directed towards emerging
priorities.
- Post 2020: CAP payments should
only to be awarded to farmers complying with minimum environmental,
social and animal welfare standards
- We must end Pillar 2 (Regional
Development) funding of Bullfighting
A
healthy market for healthy food
The value of sustainable,
honest food should be reflected in the price we pay. The real price
for food is concealed by subsidies costing millions of euros, giving
consumers the impression that food is cheap. Furthermore, the real costs
of intensive agriculture, which are kept out of sight of citizens, are
shifted onto the environment and society. A change to a sustainable food
system is needed, giving farmers a fair price for their quality products.
- The Common Agricultural Policy
needs to be thoroughly reformed. The millions of euros of subsidies
currently paid to farmers must begin to be used more responsibly and
with more thought for the long term. This budget must encourage
farmers to change to ecological agriculture working towards a point
where subsidies are ended altogether.
- Research budgets for agriculture
should be awarded to agro-ecological practices, the development of closed
loop recycling in ecosystems
and the development of resistant crop varieties. EU funds must no longer
be awarded to research that is aimed at further intensification of non-sustainable
factory farming.
- European subsidies should
be exclusively awarded on the basis of social services and performances
that contribute to a sustainable, social and animal-friendly Europe.
As long as the agricultural policy remains unreformed, only appropriate
agricultural practices and sustainable water management should be rewarded.
- The European subsidies that
fall under the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy should
exclusively be awarded to ecological agriculture.
- Member States should be given
the opportunity to take measures to ensure that farmers, growers and
dairy/cattle farmers can obtain a fair price for their products. This
will restrict the buying power of supermarkets.
- To mitigate the effects of
food speculation on global food security, food speculation should be
limited.
- The production of surpluses
of meat, eggs and dairy products should become impermissible. 'Buy-outs',
such as those that take place in times of surpluses and that are paid
for with tax revenue should be prevented.
Food security: What are your party’s
policies on reaping the potential of accessible and nutritious plant-based
food to ensure food security for European and global citizens?
- By far the largest and most
irresponsible type of food wastage is the feeding of animals with food
that can also be eaten by humans. Grains, soya and vegetable oils should
not be used as a raw material for the livestock industry.
- The EU should support the
establishment of industry bodies promoting the production and consumption
of healthy, plant-based foods
- The EU must increase funding
of research into and development of plant-based proteins.
- An EU Sub Committee of the
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee should be established
to promote best practice in plant-based food production.
- Plant and animal species and
varieties should not be the property of companies and our food supply
should not be placed in the hands of monopolists. Patents on forms of
life (such as genetic material, DNA markers) must be prohibited. Europe
must resist the efforts of companies such as Monsanto and BASF to patent
the genes of plants and animals and to dominate the food market.
- The right of farmers and cultivators
to grow the seeds of their own plants (Plant Breeder's Rights), is of
great importance to maintain diversity in food crops and free access
to them. The Animal Welfare Party wants these rights to be strengthened,
both in Europe and in developing countries, so that farmers and cultivators
can make free use of the existing agro-biodiversity without patents
making it impossible to do so.
- Accounting rules may not hinder
the free trade of seeds. The interest of small farmers, horticulturists
and food security should be favoured. Rare and old crop varieties must
be given protection. The Animal Welfare Party resists any new rules
that would endanger the biodiversity of crops.
- The development of organic
resistant varieties of crops must be able to count on the support of
the EU.
- The Animal Welfare Party opposes
the cultivation and importation of genetically modified crops anywhere
in Europe.
- EU Member States must not
be forced to permit the cultivation of GM crops on their territory.
Until the full prohibition of import and cultivation is achieved, we
want Member States and regions to be given the authority to prohibit
the cultivation of GM crops. Furthermore, when assessing these crops
and new breeding techniques, the impact on food security, freedom of
choice, and the position of small farmers must also be accurately assessed.
- Labelling for meat, dairy
products and eggs from animals that are fed with GM crops must become
mandatory.
- Europe will not support efforts
to keep cisgenesis (a form of genetic manipulation), a so-called innocent
variant of classic breeding, out of the risk assessments and licence
issuance for genetic engineering.
- New breeding techniques must
be thoroughly assessed on their impact on humans, animals, the environment,
nature and food security.
- Additionally, regions and
countries that declare themselves GM-technology free should be given
support and assistance.
Non-human animals in testing, science
and education Research on non-human animals frequently fails to predict
the actual effects on humans. What are your party’s policies
to improve the quality of testing, science and education by replacing
the use of non-human animals with the wide range of proven effective
alternatives?
Phasing
out animal testing
Animal Welfare Party
finds animal experimentation morally objectionable. Over twelve million
animals are used for research and testing in Europe every year but many
of the experiments in which animals are currently used, are superfluous
to requirements, don't significantly advance knowledge or understanding
and, in some cases, make no sense. Furthermore, animal-free
techniques deliver better knowledge about human health. We must therefore
phase out animal experimentation with binding targets for reduction,
combined with funding and support for alternatives. Animal experiments
must be replaced by humane, modern techniques in which animals do not
suffer. Whilst animal experiments continue, public scrutiny must be
increased.
- The use of primates in animal
experiments must end immediately.
- The use of animals for xenotransplantation
must end immediately.
- Genetic manipulation (including
cloning) of animals must end immediately.
- A deadline must be set to
end the “severe” suffering testing category, which may involve such
morally reprehensible procedures as forcing an animal to run until he/she
becomes exhausted or repeated electric shock treatment to induce a state
of ‘learned helplessness’.
- Following the trade ban on
cosmetics tested on animals, animal experiments for household product
ingredients and novel food ingredients must now be banned throughout
Europe.
- Europe must endeavour to ensure
the strict observance of the trade ban on cosmetics that have been tested
on animals.
- We seek a ban on all harmful
use of animals within biomedical research, toxicity testing and education.
Only non-harmful use should be permitted. Examples include non-invasive
observational or behavioural studies of domesticated species, or non-domesticated
species within sanctuaries or the wild; the education of veterinary
students via participation in beneficial clinical procedures on genuine
animal patients; and experimental treatment of animal patients, genuinely
suffering from severe, naturally-occurring disease or injury, when conventional
treatment is not effective.
- Immediate, quantitative, binding
targets for reductions in animal use should be set in all countries
using animals, with the aim of eventually replacing all harmful animal
use with non-harmful or non-animal alternatives.
- Criteria to approve animal
experiment licence applications should become harder to meet. We want
applications for animal experiments to be subject to much stricter requirements,
i.e. a prior extensive literature review. Applications for experiments
that are not deemed to be of significant importance, such as health
claims on foods, should not be granted.
- Mandatory, independent ethical
review of all experimental protocols should be implemented as a condition
of licensing, with ample opportunity for prior, independent and public
scrutiny of such protocols.
- The composition of ethics
committees must be balanced to allow for more expert animal welfare
opinion.
- Mandatory retrospective evaluation
should be introduced to assess the degree to which experimental objectives
were successfully met, the extent to which animals suffered, to help
inform both future research and further experimental licensing decisions.
- Mandatory compliance should
be a prerequisite for (public) funding of experiments, license approval,
and publication of results, with a range of best practice standards,
and each of the 3Rs: replacement, reduction and refinement of animal
use implemented before and during experiments. These would include:
minimum standards relating to animal sourcing, housing, environmental
enrichment, opportunities for social interaction for social species,
appropriate use of anaesthetics and analgesics (painkillers), animal
handling, non-invasive endpoints, and statistical input during experimental
design.
- Experimental duplication happens
far too often and is quite simply unjustifiable. We call for mandatory
prompt, public sharing of all experimental results, to avoid this sad
state of affairs from continuing.
- In the UK, we are supportive
of all efforts to repeal Section 24 of the Animals (Scientific
Procedures) Act 1986.
- Europe must no longer permit
animal experiments for the development of patents and should amend the
patent directive to avoid duplication of animal experiments.
- Funding for the further development,
scientific validation and implementation of alternative methodologies
should be substantially increased. Specifically, more funding and support
should be given to the EU Reference lab, ECVAM, so that the validation
process for alternatives can be expedited from taking years to months,
and for those alternatives to be applied throughout Europe without delay.
- A minimum of 80 million Euros
a year should to be ring-fenced and put towards the development of non-animal
alternatives. This figure represents a small proportion of the total
EU science budget but could play a huge role in ending the use of animals
in experiments.
- The EU must establish well-funded
national Centres of Excellence in the Development of Alternatives to
Animal Use, in all countries where such animal use exists.
- We call for increased, compulsory
training and continuing professional development in experimental best
practice standards and alternative methodologies for all animal researchers
and technicians.
- The breeding of lab animals
and killing of surplus animals must end.
- We believe there is a moral
imperative to provide independently-scrutinised sanctuaries, maintained
to high welfare standards, funded by industries and sectors using animals,
for those animals retired from laboratory animal use, in which such
animals shall be housed for the remainder of their natural lives.
Non-human animals in entertainment
Animals suffer needlessly even in so-called
‘good’ zoos, circuses, race-tracks and other entertainment venues.
What are your party’s policies to end the use of non-human animals
in entertainment?
Culture
and traditions are no excuse for animal suffering
The life and welfare
of animals is important. Their interests should cease to be subordinate
to culture or religion. Therefore we seek an end to the suffering of
animals as a result of cultural traditions, ‘sports’ and entertainment.
The Animal Welfare Party believes that:
- European agreements must be
amended in such a way that the interests of animals are no longer subordinate
to culture or religion.
- Harmful animal use should
not be permitted in any type of art, fashion, cultural exhibition or
entertainment.
- Bullfighting must be banned.
- Until such a ban is in force
all subsides granted to this cruel industry must end – including the
estimated 129.6 million euros per year currently being spent on rearing
bulls for bullfighting.
- Turning a blind eye to practices
such as collection of lapwings' eggs and illegal bird hunting in Malta,
Italy and France must end, and relevant Directives should be enforced.
- Due to the immense suffering
endured by thousands of animals in the racing industries, betting on
racing animals, such as horses and dogs, must end. All organised commercial
forms of racing animals must be banned.
- Europe must prohibit games
where hares are chased and torn apart by hounds (coursing).
- Pigeon racing and angling
should be brought to an end.
- The use of harmful training
methods, as seen in some equestrian sports, must be prohibited.
- The docking of horse tails
must be prohibited.
- Horse markets must become
a thing of the past.
- The use of animals, wild or
domestic, in circuses must be banned. The EU should support sanctuaries
to relocate former circus animals to live out their lives.
- Europe must support projects
providing veterinary treatment to working horses and mules and assist
community workers in mobilising equine owners to improve the welfare
of their animals.
- Sanctuaries for retired working
horses and mules must be supported by the EU.
Zoos
become sanctuaries
The exhibition and display
of animals in zoos is an outdated concept. In zoos animals are only
able to exhibit their natural behaviour in a limited way. This often
leads to apathetic and abnormal behaviour. Zoos kill healthy animals
who they can no longer use or are too expensive to keep. The Animal
Welfare Party finds this unacceptable and believes a change in the purpose
of zoos is necessary.
- The number of zoos in Europe
should be drastically reduced. Existing zoos should not expand and new
animal zoos should not be established. Zoos that fail to comply with
the European Zoos Directive should be the first to close. Animals from
zoos that are being closed should be given adequate refuge in sanctuaries
or zoos with higher welfare standards.
- All zoos should be transitioning
towards becoming animal-free zoos or animal sanctuaries.
- Until zoos have ceased to
exist, the EU must ensure that all zoos meet and improve on minimum
animal welfare standards.
- Existing enclosures should
be improved to ensure compliance with the highest welfare standards.
Enclosures that house species that are unfit for captivity should be
closed. The housing of animals must resemble their natural living conditions
as much as possible.
- The breeding of species kept
in zoos that are not included within conservation or re-introduction
programmes should be banned.
- Conservation programmes in
native habitats rather than captivity should be supported to mitigate
habitat destruction by urban development and farming.
- Zoos must serve as a sanctuary
for animals who cannot be re-socialised and or rehabilitated in their
original living environment or who cannot be relocated for other reasons.
- Dolphinariums, aquaria and
establishments that have animals on display must be phased out and new
establishments banned.
- Providing shelter to sea mammals
in need must be the only purpose of keeping them in captivity.
Common Agricultural Policy
How can Pillar 1 Basic Payments be
used to reward environmentally sustainable practices which also benefit
non-human animals?
How can Pillar 1 Green Direct Payments
be used to support farmers who wish to move away from unsustainable
‘livestock’ farming?
How can Pillar 1 Payments be used
to move away from imported non-EU animal feed, to significantly reduce
GHG emissions?
Pillars 1 & 2 An estimated over
€129.6 million in EU subsidies has been used to support bull cattle
‘fiestas’ and the ‘Toros’ industry in Spain (http://www.greens-efa.eu/fileadmin/dam/Documents/Studies/2013-5%20Bullfighting%20subsidies%20report.pdf).
What steps will your party take to end this support?
Pillar 2: Rural Development.
For each such programme, 30% of the budget is reserved for voluntary
measures beneficial to the environment. How can Pillar 2 Rural Development
Payments be used to help farmers who wish to move away from the
‘livestock’ industry?
2
Healthy agriculture, sustainable food
Agriculture
is not an industry and animals are not machines. If we close the natural
nutrient cycles and farmers are able to work in harmony with nature
again, and if consumers pay a fair price for healthy food, we can work
towards a healthy agriculture. Where, in the short term, until we have
realised our need to end our dependence upon them, animals can express
their natural behaviour, outside, and are treated with respect. Where
vegetables, grains and fruit are produced without pesticides, fertilizer
and GM technology. Where we create a healthy market that is not affected
by subsidies, but where food has real value. Where
there are short food supply chains between farmers and consumers. Those
are the ingredients of the agricultural policy that the Animal Welfare
Party envisages for the European Union.
Agriculture has always
been the policy area that Brussels pays most attention to and spends
most money on. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has created many
victims. Over the years, billions of animals have suffered and been
killed in the European livestock industry. Nature and the environment
have been seriously affected by the large scale use of pesticides and
fertilizers. Family farms have been forced onto the disastrous road
of being ever more productive. Markets in developing countries have
often been destroyed by the dumping of European surpluses. And all this
at the expense of the taxpayer. Despite the free market that Europe
says that it wishes to create, tens of billions of euros are spent on
agricultural subsidies every year, particularly benefiting large companies.
The largest part of the European budget is gobbled up by industrial
agriculture.
Sadly, the wealth of
Europe is largely based on the exploitation of people, animals and the
environment in other parts of the world. The EU makes large and irresponsible
demands on global resources and agricultural lands by its resource use
and the importation of food, livestock and biomass. By doing so, it
denies people in developing countries their justifiable share. European
subsidies to farmers and fishermen deny entrepreneurs in developing
countries a fair chance.
If it were up to the
Animal Welfare Party, European agricultural policy would be thoroughly
reformed. In the interest of a sustainable future, we aim for a radical
change of policy into an ecological, animal-friendly agriculture that
produces healthy food and which is not dependent on imports at the expense
of people and animals abroad.
The world population
currently sits at around 7 billion, expected to rise to between 8 and
10 billion by 2050. To be able to feed everybody, now and in the future,
a reduction of livestock and a transition to a more plant-based food
pattern is inevitable.
We want to use the present
agricultural subsidies to help farmers to transition to sustainable
production systems with a fair price for a fair product. Ultimately,
the system of subsidies will cease to be necessary because a healthy
market will have been created.
CAP
spending on better agriculture
The CAP budget takes
up 38% of the total EU Budget for the next five years. The focus on
sustainability within the second pillar is clearly visible by the fact
that at least 30% of the budget of each Rural Development programme
must be reserved for voluntary measures that are beneficial for the
environment and climate change. These include agri–environmental,
climate measures, organic farming, Areas of Natural Constraints (ANC),
Natura 2000 areas, forestry measures and investments that are beneficial
for the environment or climate. Over 25 billion Euros over five years
will be available under Pillar 2 ‘Voluntary Measures’
- We suggest that this should
be spent on stock-free organic farming, agro-forestry and sustainable
educational recreation, in order to ensure farmers’ livelihoods well
into the future.
- CAP Pillars should be revised
post-2020 to reflect self-sustaining agricultural systems.
- We should reduce the overall
CAP budget post-2020 so that funds can be directed towards emerging
priorities.
- Post 2020: CAP payments should
only to be awarded to farmers complying with minimum environmental,
social and animal welfare standards
- We must end Pillar 2 (Regional
Development) funding of Bullfighting
A
healthy market for healthy food
The value of sustainable,
honest food should be reflected in the price we pay. The real price
for food is concealed by subsidies costing millions of euros, giving
consumers the impression that food is cheap. Furthermore, the real costs
of intensive agriculture, which are kept out of sight of citizens, are
shifted onto the environment and society. A change to a sustainable food
system is needed, giving farmers a fair price for their quality products.
- The Common Agricultural Policy
needs to be thoroughly reformed. The millions of euros of subsidies
currently paid to farmers must begin to be used more responsibly and
with more thought for the long term. This budget must encourage
farmers to change to ecological agriculture working towards a point
where subsidies are ended altogether.
- Research budgets for agriculture
should be awarded to agro-ecological practices, the development of closed
loop recycling in ecosystems
and the development of resistant crop varieties. EU funds must no longer
be awarded to research that is aimed at further intensification of non-sustainable
factory farming.
- European subsidies should
be exclusively awarded on the basis of social services and performances
that contribute to a sustainable, social and animal-friendly Europe.
As long as the agricultural policy remains unreformed, only appropriate
agricultural practices and sustainable water management should be rewarded.
- The European subsidies that
fall under the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy should
exclusively be awarded to ecological agriculture.
- Member States should be given
the opportunity to take measures to ensure that farmers, growers and
dairy/cattle farmers can obtain a fair price for their products. This
will restrict the buying power of supermarkets.
- To mitigate the effects of
food speculation on global food security, food speculation should be
limited.
- The production of surpluses
of meat, eggs and dairy products should become impermissible. 'Buy-outs',
such as those that take place in times of surpluses and that are paid
for with tax revenue should be prevented.
What are your party’s policies on
neonicotinoids and restoring EU bee populations?
Pesticide-free
vegetables and diverse horticulture
Vegetables, grains, legumes
and fruit are the foundation of good, healthy diet. But here, a change
to sustainable production methods is also necessary. The cultivation
of vegetables should no longer be dependent on raw fossil materials
(fertilizer). The high use of pesticides severely harms biodiversity,
is a threat to our drinking water and to public health. Monocultures
make it increasingly difficult for insects and birds to find sufficient
food.
- The Animal Welfare Party wants
to drastically reduce the use of fertilizers and agrotoxins and to have
them replaced by ecological alternatives.
- Field margins, which enhance
biodiversity and accommodate natural enemies for pests, should be obligatory.
- Hazardous chemical pesticides
that pose a risk for people and animals must be taken off the market
immediately. These include neonicotinoids, which also cause bee mortality,
glyphosate, the soil fumigator metam-sodium and a large number of fungi
controllers that form a threat to public health.
- So long as agriculture is
not toxin-free, there will be strict protection for people living around
arable and horticultural areas to protect them against exposure to chemical
pesticides. Non-spray zones must be created between fields that are sprayed
with pesticides and houses, schools and recreational areas. Spraying
will not be permitted in the vicinity of public roads and paths where
people walk or cycle.
- All chemical pesticides currently
on the market must be re-tested against much stricter criteria, whereby
the precautionary principle will be applied. No animal testing will be
conducted for this. Only pesticides that are demonstrably safe for humans,
animals and the environment should be permitted to remain on the market.
- The European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA) must be thoroughly reformed. This organisation, and the commission
that writes recommendations on the admission of pesticides and genetically
modified crops, must be completely independent. We want to end the close
relationship that exists between the EFSA and the chemical industry.
- Pesticides and GM crops must
be independently tested. Studies provided by producers themselves should
not be considered sufficient to ensure safety. The recommendations of
the EFSA and the studies that these are based on must comply with the
highest standards of transparency and accessibility. Any studies that
have been used to inform a decision to admit a pesticide must be made
public, retroactively, so that independent scientists are able to criticise
the admission.
- Plant and animal species and
varieties should not be the property of companies and our food supply
should not be placed in the hands of monopolists. Patents on forms of
life (such as genetic material, DNA markers) must be prohibited. Europe
must resist the efforts of companies such as Monsanto and BASF to patent
the genes of plants and animals and to dominate the food market.
- The right of farmers and cultivators
to grow the seeds of their own plants (Plant Breeder's Rights), is of
great importance to maintain diversity in food crops and free access
to them. The Animal Welfare Party wants these rights to be strengthened,
both in Europe and in developing countries, so that farmers and cultivators
can make free use of the existing agro-biodiversity without patents
making it impossible to do so.
- Accounting rules may not hinder
the free trade of seeds. The interest of small farmers, horticulturists
and food security should be favoured. Rare and old crop varieties must
be given protection. The Animal Welfare Party resists any new rules
that would endanger the biodiversity of crops.
- The development of organic
resistant varieties of crops must be able to count on the support of
the EU.
- Restoring EU bee populations?
- 3. More
nature
- The natural
world, containing a diversity of plants, animals and ecosystems, is
the most valuable thing on the planet and thus deserves to be carefully
protected. Furthermore, the diversity of marine and land species are
the foundation of our existence. Without healthy oceans and forests
there is no clean air to breath. Without biodiversity there is no healthy
soil to grow our food. It is our duty to ensure a healthy planet, now
and in the future.
- Global biodiversity is in
crisis: every day, plant and animal species become extinct and the balance
of ecosystems is disrupted. The EU must take its share for the blame
in the loss of natural resources elsewhere on the planet. Large-scale
imports of soya, timber and palm oil into Europe are at the direct expense
of tropical rainforests and primary forests, while overfishing by the
European fishing fleet is significantly harming marine ecosystems worldwide.
- The environment and biodiversity
are also under threat in Europe. Almost 25% of Europe's wild species
face extinction. Furthermore, most of the ecosystems are so severely
compromised they are no longer able to provide their valuable services.
This damage also poses a threat to food security and causes the EU to
incur huge social and economic losses.
- The Animal Welfare Party seeks
to increase the protection of the environment and natural world and
desires the EU to end its contribution to environmental destruction.
We want the EU to lead the way in tackling the biodiversity crisis and
not wait until other world players, or non-governmental organisations,
take action.
- More nature in Europe
- Protect
and repair the environment
- Despite all the fine words
about the essence of maintaining biodiversity, in practice the environment
is hardly protected at all. European Directives are not adhered to or
enforced too late, and some Member States are trying to renege on these
agreements in order to prioritise economic development over environmental
protection. The EU is currently not meeting the promises to achieve
the 2010 Biodiversity Target made at UN level (Convention on Biological
Diversity, CBD) to halt biodiversity loss. We simply cannot afford to
sacrifice more natural capital for short-term gain. We must ensure EU environmental policies are successfully
implemented in key areas of water management, forest conservation, agriculture,
fisheries and biodiversity restoration and preservation. The Animal
Welfare Party believes we should:
- End environmentally harmful
subsidies (CAP and fossil fuels)
- Shift to green economies by
making resource efficiency, reuse, reduce and recycling a reality
- Give real value to nature
(services, ecological value, and ‘unused’ value, e.g. by leaving
certain resources in the ground in areas of outstanding natural beauty
or scientific interest)
- Make private investments more
sustainable and increase tax on environmentally damaging products
- The EU must draw up a Biodiversity
Delta Plan. Subsidies that are harmful to biodiversity should be immediately
abolished and biodiversity loss will have substantially diminished by
2020.
- The Biodiversity plan must
include steps to avoid the decline of Europe’s network of protected
areas.
- A robust European Natural
Network of corridors should be established so that species can migrate
between different areas and ecosystems and populations become more resilient.
At least 25% of the land and fresh water surface would be protected,
and connecting the Natura 2000-zones would be given priority.
- Everyone has the right to
a green and healthy living environment. The EU must stimulate the greening
of urban areas with a view to public health, climate and biodiversity.
A standard for urban greening should be implemented that, at least,
reflects the standard used by the United Nations (48 m2 of green space
per villager or urban citizen).
- Revive EU’s rivers and lakes
to ecological health.
- Obstacles in European rivers
that obstruct the migration of fish and cause fish fatalities should
be removed. New pumping stations and drainage installations must be
fish-friendly.
- Existing European environmental
agreements such as Natura 2000, the Water Framework Directive and the
National Emissions Ceilings Directive (e.g. for ammonia) are required
to limit the environmental damage caused by the EU's Common Agricultural
Policy. Environmental agreements will therefore not be relaxed, but
tightened up and strictly observed.
- The Animal Welfare Party seeks
to preserve and protect at least 25% of European seas by designating
them as marine reserves. No activities harmful to marine ecosystems
will be permitted in this network of natural marine areas, including
fishing boats or industrial activities. Important breeding grounds,
such as the Mediterranean where the endangered tuna mates, will be closed
to the hunting of these animals.
- Shipwrecks are hotspots for
marine biodiversity and will be protected as much as possible.
Fishing techniques that
severely harm marine ecosystems, i.e. deep-sea and beam trawl fishing
must be banned.
Common Fisheries Policy: What are
your party’s policies on protecting both endangered and other fish
in European waters?
Fish
Restricting
catches
Worldwide, over a trillion
fish and marine animals are killed every year. European fishery is responsible
for the structural overfishing of European waters. No less than 88%
of fish species are overfished and 30% may not recover to their original
numbers. Aided by EU subsidies, European fishing fleets also plunder
fishing banks outside Europe, for example, offshore Africa. The Animal
Welfare Party believes we must:
- Abolish fishery subsidies.
- Continue in our ambition to
end overfishing.
- Combat illegal, unregulated
and unreported (IUU) fishing.
- The precautionary principle
must be applied to the EU Common Fisheries Policy. Fishing quotas must
no longer be set at a level higher than that considered responsible
by independent marine biologists. If there is no scientific information
available, fishing should not be allowed or considerable safety margins
should be incorporated with a very low fishing quota.
- In places where ecosystems
and fishing banks are degraded, a moratorium on fishing must be called
for to give nature a chance to recover.
- A fishing ban on the most
vulnerable fish species, such as eel, cod and tuna must be implemented
in the short term.
- The EU should rapidly scale
down the overcapacity of the European fishing fleet. The fishing capacity
of the fleet should not be any larger than the ecosystems European waters
can support.
- Fish that are caught in nets
or by longlines experience immense suffering before death. The Animal
Welfare Party wants a prohibition on all methods of fishing and killing
that involve long-term suffering and an end to slaughter without any
prior stunning, such as percussive stunning and pithing.
- We want to stop destructive
fishing techniques. Monster trawlers, deep-sea fishing and beam trawls
that destroy the seabed with their towed nets should be relegated to
the past.
- The existing arrangements
to prevent harmful fishing practices must be strictly observed. The
prohibition on dumping caught fish to catch commercially attractive
fish (high grading) must be enforced by using cameras or supervision
on board, at the expense of the sector.
- The fishing vessels of ship-owners
found to not be observing regulations must be chained.
- The EU must strongly reduce
by-catch by imposing a prohibition on non-selective fishing methods.
If by-catch does occur and the animals have not survived, they must
be landed and deducted from the catch quota, which will be lowered as
a result.
- The use of trammel must end
since porpoises and other fish are frequently caught in these standing
nets, causing them to suffocate.
No
fish farms
Fish farms are a new
way of factory farming and are no solution to the problem of overfishing:
many farmed fish are fed with wild caught fish. They are unsustainable
and far from animal-friendly. The frequent use of antibiotics and other
chemicals on fish farms further compound these problems.
- As long as the welfare of
fish can't be guaranteed and fish farms are dependent on wild caught
fish, the Animal Welfare Party seeks an end to permits issued for new
fish farms
- A test on animal welfare and
sustainability should be implemented retrospectively for existing fish
farms. If it cannot be demonstrated that the farming and keeping of
fish is taking place in a sustainable and animal-friendly way, it should
be prohibited.
- Using a more humane method
of killing must become obligatory.
- Cooking lobsters, crabs and
prawns alive must be prohibited.
If elected as an MEP for 2014-2019,
which key policy issues do you intend to address related to:
Reducing the use of non-human animals
for human purposes?
In addition to the points mentioned above,
our policies also include:
1. The
moral and legal status of animals
Animals
are living creatures, not toys or accessories or a means of entertainment.
Animals deserve protection. This starts with the recognition of their
intrinsic value, which is independent of the value that people place
upon them, and respect for their own needs. Such recognition should
apply to all animals and define the limits of the purposes for which
animals may be used.
Non-human animals are
not property, but sentient beings. Article 6B of the Lisbon Treaty recognises
animals as sentient beings, placing a duty upon Member States to protect
their welfare. In fact, the European Union has recognised animals as
sentient beings with feelings and consciousness since 1992. But, at
the same time, Europe places cultural and religious traditions - such
as bullfighting - above the interests of animals. Economic interests
are given more consideration than the interests of animals. Production
increase is, officially, still the only purpose of the agricultural
policy. In everyday life, animals in Europe are primarily given the
status of a commodity.
In addition to the billions
of animals that die in the livestock industry every year, it is still
permitted in Europe to breed animals and to kill them for a superfluous
and cruel fashion product like fur. Tens of millions of minks, foxes,
chinchillas and rabbits are victims of the fur industry every year.
Bulls are tortured for 'entertainment' in Spain and France. Across Europe,
thousands of dolphins and other sea mammals wither away in dolphinariums.
Over twelve million animals are used for research and testing in Europe
every year. Animal suffering in the EU is large-scale and serious.
The Animal Welfare Party
rejects the notion that animals can be used for any purpose humans see
fit. Entertainment, sport and fashion are not justifiable reasons for
causing harm to or affecting the welfare of animals. We believe that
before animals are used for a purpose, the legitimacy of that purpose
should be assessed - after all, their life and welfare is at stake.
Europe must become more reluctant towards the use of animals. The Animal
Welfare Party will promote better protection against neglect, abuse
and misuse. Europe should support that protection to a greater degree,
both inside and outside its borders. At international level, for example
the United Nations; we want the EU to demonstrate that it strongly advocates
improvements in animal welfare.
Furthermore, evidence
suggests a link between abuse of non-human animals and human violence.
Several serial killers are known to have abused and killed other animals
before ‘progressing’ to killing human beings. Many human health
and social professionals are still not aware of this link and proper
integration between human and animal services is lacking. Humans and
animals may therefore be at risk.
Alongside the continuous
need for improving human rights across the world, it is time to recognise
other animals as beings in their own right. The Animal Welfare Party
believes protection ultimately means animals are no longer used as a
means to an end.
- The Animal Welfare Party believes
a consultation on the European Convention on Human Rights should include
a question on reform to tackle its species exclusivity.
- The Universal Declaration
of Animal Rights was drawn up in 1978. The EU should revisit the proposed
Declaration and support its premise.
- A permanent Parliamentary
Commission for Animal Interests should be established to assess acceptability
of all forms of animal use on the basis of cost-benefit analyses.
- The media has a huge role
to play in influencing how animals are perceived. Despite animals being
recognised as sentient beings in the Lisbon Treaty and a duty of care
placed upon Member States to protect their welfare, animal suffering
is still frequently trivialised in advertising campaigns and editorial
content across Europe. Animal Welfare Party intends to push for bodies
regulating advertising, broadcast and press content to view such issues
with the seriousness they deserve and for these bodies to be better
funded and supported, where the latter have been factors in their inaction.
Mapping
a future without a livestock industry
Annually, across the
EU, more than 7 billion animals are kept and slaughtered for the production
of meat, dairy products and eggs. Such figures are unacceptable.
Animal Welfare Party's
long-term vision is of a Europe that has ended its dependence upon animals
and animal products because we have come to understand the devastating
effects that such dependence has upon the environment, human health
and animal welfare.
Our long-term vision
is of a Europe that lives healthily and sustainably, and where animals
are not exploited for any purpose.
Our Committee of National
Officers and many of our members are already living such a lifestyle
to 'walk our talk' and demonstrate that humans can thrive without the
use of animal products.
It is not easy for any
major Party to challenge the status quo on livestock farming but nothing
short of a full scale re-evaluation is needed to combat climate change
and preventable disease.
In the short term, Animal
Welfare Party supports direct welfare measures which may positively
impact animals’ lives now. Our support for welfare measures does not
detract from our long-term goal of ending all animal abuse. We believe
the very least animals deserve is appropriate species-specific husbandry
and care, in accordance with the Five Freedoms. Any measures that restrict
animals’ natural behaviour, social development and cause distress
and harm through the course of their entire lives must be ended immediately
and replaced with higher welfare alternatives.
The Animal Welfare Party
believes that we must work towards an end to intensive livestock farming.
- A roadmap must be introduced
to enable a rapid shift to animal-friendly and sustainable livestock
farming.
- Factory farms and animal welfare
do not go together. A European prohibition on the establishment and
development of large-scale livestock farms must be introduced.
- Small-scale livestock farm
systems where the natural resistance of animals is central to good health
must become the standard. The maximum number of animals permitted to
be kept must be gradually lowered until livestock farms return to operating
within humane standards and the limitations of the earth.
Increasing environmental sustainable
plant agriculture?
Covered earlier in the response.
Using crop farming to increase global
human food security?
Covered earlier in the response.
Thank you for taking the time to share
your views and your party’s policies with our supporters. Finally,
if you’d like to share, would you describe yourself as:
Vegan
Other, please describe:
I am a long term vegan (almost 20 years)
and believe very strongly in setting positive examples of plant-based
living, demonstrating that humans can thrive on plant-based diets. For
this reason, I was also a founding member of Vegan Runners UK and continue
to run with this group. (Vanessa Hudson, Party Leader and Lead Candidate,
AWP, London Region).
All of our Committee of National Officers
are vegan.
7 of our 8 candidates for the London
Region in the EU elections are vegan. 1 is vegetarian.