Potential risks of metal toxicity in contaminated sediments of De�le river in Northern France


Beatriz Louri�o-Cabana a, Ludovic Lesven a, Adeline Charriau a, Gabriel Billon a *, Baghdad Ouddane a and Abdel Boughriet b

a Equipe de Chimie Analytique et Marine, Universit� de Lille 1, FRE CNRS G�osyst�mes 3298, Bat. C8, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France

b Universit� Lille Nord de France, Rue de l’Universit�, P.O. Box 819, 62408 B�thune, France

Corresponding author*

Dr. Gabriel BILLON


Tel: +33 320434929

Fax: +33 320434822


The aim of this paper was to evaluate the potential sediment cumulative damage and toxicity due to metal contamination in a polluted zone of De�le river (in northern France) from nearby two smelters. Metal-enrichment factors and geoaccumulation indices measured with sediment depth revealed that ─ compared to background levels either in local reference soils or in world rivers sediments / suspended particulate matter ─ Cd contributed to the highest pollution levels, followed by Zn, Pb and to a much lesser extent Cu and Ni. A comparison of the vertical distribution of AVS (Acid Volatile Sulfides), SEM (Simultaneously Extracted Metals), TMC (Total Metal Concentrations), TOC (Total Organic Carbon) and interstitial water-metal concentrations in the sediment allowed us to highlight the extent of toxicity caused by Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni and Cu and to raise the possibility of their association with certain geochemical phases. To assess the actual environmental impacts of these metals in De�le river, numerical sediment quality guidelines were further used in the present work. Sedimentary Pb, Zn, and Cd contents largely exceeded PEC (Probable Effect Concentration) values reported as consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. As for risks of toxicity from pore waters, metal concentrations reached their maxima at the surficial layers of the sediment (1-3 cm) and IWCTU (Interstitial Water Criteria Toxicity Unit) observed for Pb and to a lesser extent Cd, violated the corresponding water quality data recommended by USEPA.


Sediment; pore water; trace metal; pollution; water quality; toxicity


Large uncontrolled metal inputs from industrial sources have contributed to increase pollution in rivers [1-6]. Depending on hydrodynamics and environmental conditions, metals tend to accumulate in sediments at the bottom of the water column; and if toxic levels are reached, metals can affect benthic organisms and food chain, raising the possibility of a threat of human health for local population. To obtain a realistic estimate of the actual environmental impact of metals in an aquatic medium, their chemical nature or potential mobility / availability must be addressed. Trace-metals global determination including the characteristics of metals in water and the identification of the geochemical phases of metals in sediments as well as quantification by carrying out chemical speciation is crucial to evaluate the ecological risks of these contaminants in the study area [1, 3, 4, 7-9]. In recent works, vertical sediment and/or pore water profiles were often used to examine the contamination history of different aquatic systems [10-14]; Metal distribution / enrichment / accumulation in sediment layers were studied and data constituted valuable tools for assessing both the extent of metal pollution and sediment quality [9, 14, 15].

On this view, we examine in the present work a river, De�le, that is a major drinking-water source for the population living in the "Nord-Pas de Calais" region (in northern France), however, with severe metallic pollution, particularly, in a 3-km zone from nearby two smelters (Metaleurop and Umicore) near Douai city. Metaleurop factory was in activity for more than a century and was closed in January 2003. Umicore factory has still been in activity since 1869. The behaviour of trace metals in waters and sediments of De�le river had been extensively by our research group [16-21]. For this reason, only data obtained with a series of sediment cores that are considered as the most representative ones of the polluted site of De�le river, is presented in this paper. Speciation analysis of the different sedimentary compartments has been used to provide information of mobility/availability of anthropogenic metals with depth; And to predict sediment toxicity, metal concentration levels in sediment layers have been compared with those of potential concern (by using water and sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems [22-26]), that might cause or contribute to adverse effects on sediment-dwelling organisms.

The present study has been initiated with the following objectives: (i) to determine the levels of contamination in De�le river in relation to primary sources of pollution; (ii) to perform water and sediment quality assessments; (iii) to evaluate potential ecological risks due to metal pollution in a populated area; and (iv) to maximize the scientific basis for management decisions and restorations. Regarding this last point, the results of this investigation would have implications for a rational management of De�le river and should be used for comparison with future sediment quality data. In addition, such a scientific and preventive approach based on better understanding of the source, fate and effects of metallic contaminants in an aquatic system would also be of great interest for the development of pollution-control and sediment-remediation strategies in other polluted rivers in the world.


2.1. Location and sampling

Smelting activities are well-known to be responsible for significant metallic pollution in soils around De�le river [27-29]. Taking into consideration recent analytical data obtained at different stations along De�le river [16-18, 20], we had chosen in the present work a sampling site located in a part of De�le river that was considered as its most polluted zone (Figure 1). Sediment samplings were carried out on May 2007. Undisturbed sediments cores were collected together with their overlying water using 35-cm long Perpex tubes. One was used to assess directly in the field the profiles versus depth of redox potential and pH, and another one was employed to determine in situ the vertical concentration profile of dissolved sedimentary oxygen. In the laboratory, one core was used for the analysis of trace metal total concentrations in pore waters and sediment particles, and another one was dedicated to the analysis of acid volatile sulfides (AVS) and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) concentrations.

Under a nitrogen atmosphere inside a glove box, the cores were sliced in 2-cm thick slices. A part of these sliced sediments was kept in plastic bags previously purged with N2 for solid analyses and the remaining part was centrifuged (2500 rpm for 30 min) in order to recover supernatant waters. The centrifuged tubes were returned to the N2 flushed glove box, where pore waters were filtered with 0.45 �m Alltech filters (cellulose acetate membrane) and immediately acidified with ultra-pure nitric acid (100 �L in 10 mL of pore water).

2.2. Chemical analyses

AVS contents were measured according to the method described by Allen and his coworkers [30]. Shortly, approximately 2 g of wet (anoxic) sediment were mixed under nitrogen with a 6M HCl solution during one hour at 25�C. H2S gas was generated and trapped inside a 1M NaOH solution to form dissolved sulfide, and its concentration was subsequently measured with a sulfide specific electrode composed of a Ag2S polycrystal membrane (Orion). For a couple of sediment samples, AVS concentrations were measured in triplicate, and results were found to be reproducible with an analytical precision ≤ 15 %.

Simultaneously Extracted Metals (SEM) were extracted from 1 g of raw sediment with 20 mL of a 1M HCl solution [31-34]. The mixture was shacked at room temperature during 24 hours, and afterwards filtrated through a 0.45 �m Alltech filter (cellulose acetate membrane). SEM concentrations present in the filtrate were determined using ICP-AES (Vista Pro, Varian). Total analytical errors made on SEM measurements in all the SEM extraction procedure used were ≤ 10 % [35].

The contents of total organic carbon (TOC) in De�le-river sediments at different depths were determined first by drying samples at 60�C during 1 day, and second by heating them to 450 �C for 12 hours in order to assess the ignition loss: at each step of this heating procedure, carbon was measured using an elemental CHNS analyser (model 932 LECO). Mean error percentage on TOC was � 10 %.

After filtration and acidification, pore waters were analyzed by means of ICP-MS [Thermo Scientific, Finnigan Element II (in the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway) and Thermo Elemental X7 (in the University of Lille 1, France)] to determine the concentrations of dissolved metals (Fe, Mn, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn). For pore water element analysis, the analytical quality was assured by analysing a riverine water standard reference material (SLRS-4) provided by the National Research Council of Canada. Overall, trace-metal concentrations were found to be within 80-100 % of the certified values [18]. After an acid digestion of sedimentary solids with concentrated acids (according to two steps: firstly with HF and secondly with aqua regia), total concentrations of sedimentary metals (Fe, Mn, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were determined using ICP-MS. For total sediment element analysis, analytical quality was assured by analysing the selected Canadian International Sediment Standards HISS-1, MESS-3 and PACS-2. The concentrations obtained were generally found to be within 90-100 % of the certified ones [18].


3.1. Environmental quality assessment on undisturbed sediments of De�le river

Geoaccumulation index (Igeo)  The level of pollution in sediment solids from this river can be evaluated by comparing current metal concentrations with preindustrial ones through the calculation of the geoaccumulation index, as pointed out previously [18, 36].

For that purpose, the geochemical background contents of the selected metals in the studied area were those found in Loessic and alluvial reference soils [28]. As a whole, the Igeo values determined for the selected metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) revealed that all along the cores studied sliced samples were characterized as very strongly polluted (class 6) for Cd (Igeo, 6.47-7.96), Pb (Igeo, 4.77-7.80) and Zn (Igeo, 5.30-6.02), moderately to strongly polluted (class 3 and 4) for Cu (Igeo, 2.73-3.37), and unpolluted (class 0) for Ni [Igeo, (-0.51)-(+0.86)] (see Figure 2).The averaged pollution degree of these metals decreased in the following order: Cd > Pb ~ Zn > Cu >> Ni, as shown in Figure 2.

Sediment enrichment factor (SEF)  To evaluate anthropogenic influences on studied solid sediments in De�le river, as proposed recently [18], the SEF ratio can be used as a pollution index by referring selected-metals concentrations to background levels of metals either in world-rivers sediments/suspended particulate matters or in local soils [29, 37]. Overall Cd, Pb and Zn indicated the heaviest contamination with SEF values varying with depth between 258 and 499 for Cd, 56-514 for Pb and 56-157 for Zn. De�le sediments were in contrast much less polluted in copper (4.1  SEFCu  21) and nearly unpolluted in nickel (SEFNi  1.8). Note further that, at some depths (13, 19, 21 cm), maximum SEF values were detected in particular for anthropogenic metals (Cd, Pb and Zn), suggesting stronger inputs in some periods of industrial exploitation. From these data, a similar metallic pollution scale was found as that observed from Igeo values, i.e.: Cd  Pb > Zn >Cu >> Ni.

3.2. AVS, SEM and total metal concentrations

Because the solubility product constants (Ksp) of MeS (with Me2+: Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+) are lower than those of FeS and MnS [38], sediment sulfides which are composed of FeS and MnS, can react with cationic metals (Me2+) to generate more insoluble metal sulfides [39]. Such a reaction scheme then reduces the availability of the metals, “Me”, for benthic organisms and thereby contributes to diminish the potential risk of metal toxicity in the sediment [39-45]. By treating sediment with cold hydrochloric acid, many sediment sulfides are liberated: amorphous and crystalline FeS, greigite Fe3S4 as well as MnS and other metal sulfides, organic-S phases, and even dissolved sulfide compounds and polysulfides [42, 46]. These are called Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS), and are considered globally as a key distribution phase controlling trace-metals geochemistry [39, 43, 47, 48] . The vertical distribution of AVS in a sediment core sampled in De�le river is presented in Figure 3. Overall, AVS contents increase gradually with depth, however, with some fluctuations. The vertical distribution of total organic carbon (TOC) is also shown in Figure 3. It is noticed that the profiles of AVS and TOC with depth differ somewhat each other, suggesting that: (i) the supply of organic carbon along the sediment core may be a factor less important for AVS generation than the SO42- reduction process; and (ii) consequently sulphates should be rate limiting in De�le-river sediments (as observed for instance in Waal-river sediments, The Netherlands [49]).

On the other hand, cationic metals (Cd2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+) extracted in a 1M hydrochloric acid solution (and called ∑SEM: Simultaneously Extracted Metals) are often considered to be potentially bioavailable in sediments under variable hydrological conditions [49, 50]. In this context, a comparison of the vertical distribution of AVS, SEM and total metal concentrations in the sediment can bring relevant information about metal partitioning between the pore water and the solid phase, and hence, on metal mobility in the sedimentary medium.

In the present work, ∑SEM represents the sum of all the SEMMe contents (with Me = Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) determined in mmol of metal per kg of sediment. The evolution of ∑SEM with depth in De�le-river sediments is compared to that of AVS (Figure 3) because the potential availability /toxicity of trace metals is intimately related to the AVS and ∑SEM contents in the sediment [39, 51-53]. It can be seen that the molar concentration of ∑SEM is greater than that of AVS in the first centimetres of the surface sediment (i.e. with ∑SEM/AVS ratios > 1); indicating that the toxicity to aquatic organisms in terms of “heavy” metals is likely certain in the top layers. On the contrary, at lower depths, ∑SEM becomes closer to AVS, suggesting that metal toxicity tends to decrease somewhat with depth. Indeed, it is assumed that: (i) when SEM is in excess with reference to AVS, trace metals can exist substantially in pore waters and thereby affect benthic organisms [43, 54, 55], and consequently, sediment is considered to be potentially toxic [39, 56-59]; and (ii) conversely when there is sufficient AVS in the sediment to scavenge all the available trace metals, metal toxicity to benthic animals should not take place in the sedimentary medium, and sediment is then non-toxic [55, 57]. However, such interpretations had often been criticized because there are many other metal-binding phases such as organic matter, carbonates and oxides able to cause increased toxicity in the sediment [54, 57, 60-63]. In this context, to assess the additional binding distribution of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn among various geochemical phases other than AVS, the sequential extraction procedure [64-67] was previously applied by our research group to anoxic sediments of De�le river [19]. It was found that the key binding fractions are: (i) sulfides/organic matter for copper (82%-84%), and to a lesser extent for cadmium (35%-70%) and nickel (26%-30%); (ii) Fe and Mn oxides/hydroxides for cadmium (26%-62%), zinc (38%-42%) and to a lesser extent for nickel (23%-24%); and (iii) exchangeable ions and carbonates for Ni (7%-9%) and Zn (2%-6%). All these findings do reveal that, in addition to AVS, a part of ∑SEM is likely to be bound to the variable matrices contained in the sediment, mainly: organic matter, Fe and Mn oxides/hydroxides and exchangeable ions and carbonates. As for lead, we believe that this metal is in fact preferentially associated with sulfides in the crystalline form of galena which was in the past deposited in this area, as previously evidenced [19].

Furthermore, the profiles of SEMMe and total metal concentrations (TMC) measured with depth along a De�le-river sediment core revealed both similar trends (Figure 4), with peak values recorded around the depths of 13 cm and 19 cm, indicating a more significant metal contamination at these depths, which correspond to certain time periods (not yet dated in the past) of industrial exploitation in this area. Note that the appearance of these peaks is more pronounced for Cd, Zn and Pb than for Cu and Ni, confirming their anthropogenic origins [18].

It is also found that SEMMe contents determined for these metals in De�le-river sediments account for a relatively large percentage of the total metal concentrations according to the following order: 23-32 % for cadmium; 20-26 % for zinc; 13-22 % for lead; and to a lesser extent: 11-15 % for nickel and 2-15 % for copper. As a whole, these proportions indicate close associations of these metals with sulfides in the sediment. It is worth noting that, as ∑SEM exceeds slightly AVS in most cases, the remaining metals (corresponding to the difference: ∑SEM – AVS) are either selectively bound with other compositions of sediments (including carbonates, oxides/hydroxides and organic matter) or are remobilized into the pore water. Based on [SEM-AVS] contents in sediments, several authors made reliable predictions on potential risks of trace metals in aquatic media [39, 40, 68-70]. On this view, the evolution of both [SEMMe – AVS] and ∑SEM versus interstitial water concentrations of metals measured at different sediment depths in De�le river (Figure 5) reveal several features: (i) dissolved metal concentrations in pore waters are clearly controlled by the parameter [SEM-AVS] for each metal through the effects of AVS on the metal distribution in the sedimentary medium; (ii) [SEM-AVS] values found for the studied metals are all negative, except partially for zinc in surface sediments; and (iii) the most available metal able to cause any medium toxicity is zinc, followed by lead. Note further that in this aquatic medium the potential risk of metal toxicity should prevail predominantly in the first centimetres of the surface sediment; Thus, according to the USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), De�le river sediments belong to Tier 2 at 3-23 cm depths with [∑SEM-AVS] values varying from -0.91 to 3.51 �mol g-1, whereas they belong to Tier 1 at surface depths with [∑SEM-AVS] values reaching up to 8.75 �mol g-1, with probable associated adverse effects on aquatic life [53].

The organic carbon-normalized excess SEM (i.e.: when SEM exceeds AVS) that is defined as: (∑SEM-AVS)/foc (where foc represents the fraction of organic carbon in the sediment), is also used in the present work to predict the occurrence of sediment toxicity caused by metals, as proposed previously [70, 71]. The variation of (∑SEM-AVS)/foc calculated at different sediment depths in De�le river is illustrated in Figure 3. Overall, we found values ranging from -17 to 592, suggesting that the risk of metal toxicity is uncertain in surface sediment (at 1-5 cm depths) and no toxic at depths lower than 5 cm (according to the guidelines of USEPA [72]), because of higher AVS contents detected in buried sediments.

To summarize, SEM, AVS, TMC, TOC and interstitial water-metal concentration relationships were used in this paragraph in order to highlight the extent of toxicity caused by metals in undisturbed sediments of De�le river. However, to improve our diagnosis of water quality in De�le river, numerical sediment quality guidelines reported in the literature are necessary to be used in the present work as an empirical approach in the interpretation of our results and in the predictions of possible environmental impacts.

3.3. Risks of toxicity from sedimentary metals

In recent development in sediment quality guidelines [22], the reliability in predicting toxicity in sediments were assessed from consensus-based values for individual contaminants.

These Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines (CBSQGs) have only considered effects to benthic macro-invertebrate species (and not the potential with time for bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms and subsequent food chain transfers). In this context, PEC (Probable Effect Concentration [73]) has been defined as the upper effect level at which toxicity to benthic-dwelling organisms are predicted to be probable. In doing assessments of sediment quality, recommended sediment quality guideline values for metals and associated levels of concern (PEC) to be used were previously reported [22, 73].

An index of toxicity risk, PEQ (probable-effect quotient), was evaluated in this work for each studied metal by dividing its total sedimentary concentration by the probable effect concentration (PEC) [22]. The PEQ variations with depth obtained for Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn are shown in Figure 6. Overall, it was found that, whatever sediment depths, the metal concentrations of sedimentary Pb, Zn and Cd largely exceeded PEC values with PEQ values  10, suggesting a potential toxicity of these metals in De�le sediments. Conversely, it was shown that the toxicity risks were much lower for Cu and Ni, with PEQ values  1.3 (Figure 6).

To estimate more globally the toxicity risk resulting from metal mixtures, the individual PEQMe for the selected metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were summed, ∑PEQMe, and considered as toxic units (TU) [25]. This toxicity index was plotted against sediment depth (Figure 6). As a whole, excepted for Cu and Ni (with PEQMe values lower than 1.3), ∑PEQMe values are somewhat higher in buried sediments with a toxicity profile similar to those shown in Figure 4, suggesting that metal contamination decreased slightly in surface sediments since Metaleurop smelter was closed in 2003.

3.4. Toxic unit analysis in pore waters

The levels of interstitial waters quality in De�le sediments were examined in the present work by applying to each single metal, “Me”, a water quality index named IWCTU (criteria toxicity unit of interstitial water) and defined as:

������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� (1)

Where [Me]i.w. represents the concentration of the dissolved metal “Me” and FCVMe is the hardness dependent final chronic value for each metal [24, 26, 74, 75]. Firstly, the FCV values of the selected metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were determined with depth (Table 1) and, secondly, the IWCTU index was calculated from equation (3) for each metal at every sediment depth (see the data reported in Table 2). As a whole, it was shown that in surface sediments (i.e. at 1-3 cm depths), the IWCTU values observed for Pb and to a lesser extent for Cd violated the corresponding water quality data recommended by USEPA [24]. As often observed previously by several authors [76-80], metal pore water concentrations reached their maxima at the surficial layers of the sediment (~ 1-3 cm), suggesting a metal release from biogenic material during the aerobic degradation of organic matter [78]. In contrast, in deeper sediment layers ( 7 cm), the IWCTU values were found to be lower than 1, and no violations of the recommended USEPA water quality data were then detected. Furthermore, two indexes were used to estimate water quality based on the chemical response from multiple metals at a certain sediment depth [75]:

∑IWCTUMe, where IWCTUMe represents the individual toxicity level of each metal in the interstitial water;

and the Nemeraw Index (NI) defined as:

������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� ������������� (2)

The ∑IWCTUMe and (NI) values listed in Table 2 did show that interstitial waters were seriously contaminated in the first centimetres of surface sediments and that this contamination significantly decreased at depths lower than 7 cm. The depletion of dissolved metals observed with depth was indeed explained as follows. Firstly, the mineralization process of organic matter with the reduction of SO42- involving in the sediment according to [81-83]:

53 SO42- + (CH2O)106(NH3)16H3PO4  106 HCO3- + 16 NH4+ + 53 HS- + HPO42- + 39 H+ (3)

Secondly, sulfides and/or carbonates generated through reaction (3) interacted favourably with Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Cu2+ and Ni2+ to form authigenic minerals in the buried sediment [19]. Likewise, the OWCTU values (overlying water criteria toxicity units) obtained for these metals in the overlying water were low under weak hydrodynamic conditions, and therefore did not indicate any violation of USEPA water quality data (Table 2). Consequently, our investigations did reveal that a potential metal toxicity occurred dangerously in the first centimetres of surface sediments (see the impact grade in Table 2) in which microorganisms used oxidants according to the following sequence: O2  NO3- Mn (III, IV)  Fe(III)  SO42- [84-86] to initiate anaerobic oxidation reactions for organic matter mineralization.


In doing assessments of metallic pollution with sediment depth in De�le river, it was shown that - from metal enrichment factors (SEF) and geoaccumulation indexes (Igeo) - Pb, Zn and Cd contents were above background levels in the studied cores, while those of Ni and Cu were generally around background concentration ranges. Overall, the relative importance of metal pollution in De�le sediments showed the following order: Cd > Pb > Zn > Ni >> Cu.

SEMZn predominated largely over all the other metals, and accounted for 83-90 % of the total amount of acid extractable metals, followed by SEMPb with 8-16%, whereas the total contribution of Cd, Cu and Ni to the ∑SEM value did not exceed 2%. By comparing AVS to SEM, the possibility of associations between trace metals and sulfides in anoxic sediments of De�le river was raised, particularly, in deeper layers. The identification of potential additional metal-binding phases competing with the AVS fraction was also done with: exchangeable ions and carbonates for Ni and Zn; Fe and Mn oxides/hydroxides for Cd, Zn, and to a lesser extent Ni; and probably organic matter for Cu and to a lesser extent Cd and Ni.

Predictions of sediment toxicity were made using consensus based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems: (i) potential risks of metal toxicity exist in this river with individual PEQ quotients reaching up to 10, and the toxicity sum, ΣPEQ, of all the selected metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) ranging from 21.9 to 147.0; (ii) interstitial waters were seriously contaminated in the first centimetres of surface sediments with the water quality index, IWCTU, reaching up to 29.5 and 20.9 for Pb and Cd respectively, and the sum, ΣIWCTU, calculated for Cd+Cu+Ni+Pb+Zn ranging from 0.3 to 52.5. This latter observation suggests that possible adverse environmental impacts should occur under sediment resuspension events. In this context, complementary studies are under way in the field and in the laboratory to better understand how sedimentary trace metals behave under strong hydrodynamic conditions and to assess the real implications of any physical disturbances on the water quality of De�le river.

Figure Captions

Figure 1: De�le-river map and location of the sediment sampling site, close to a former Pb-Zn smelter (Metaleurop).

Figure 2: Geoaccumulation indexes (Igeo) calculated for the trace metals Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in polluted sediments of De�le river. The histogram represents average Igeo values measured all along the sediment cores and deviation bars limit the minimum and maximum Igeo values observed for each metal. (a) Data published by Martin and Whitfield (1983) [37]; (b) averaged values published by Sterckeman et al. (2000, 2002) [27, 28].

Figure 3: Evolution with De�le-river sediment depth of (a) SEM (simultaneously extracted metals in mmol kg-1), AVS (acid volatile sulfides in mmol kg-1), TOC (total organic carbon in mgC g-1), and (b) the ratio (∑ SEM – AVS) / foc (where foc represents the sedimentary organic carbon fraction).

Figure 4: Variations with depth of total concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn and corresponding SEM (simultaneously extracted metals) in De�le-river sediments (mmol kg-1).

Figure 5: (a) Dissolved concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn (in �mol L-1) plotted against the concentrations SEMMe – AVS (in �mol g-1) measured in a sediment core of De�le-river. (b) Sum of dissolved metallic concentrations (in �mol L-1) plotted against ∑ SEM – AVS (in �mol g-1) measured in the same core.

Figure 6: Sum of the toxic units (∑PEQMe) estimated for the trace metals Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in suspended particulate matter (water column) and in De�le river sediments. PEQCu and PEQNi represent individually less than 1.3 (not shown in this histogram).

Table captions

Table 1: Hardness-dependent final chronic values (FCVMe) determined for Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in the water column and in interstitial waters extracted at various depths of De�le river sediments.

Table 2: Metal concentrations in interstitial waters extracted from De�le-river sediments, and response indices for single metal (criteria toxicity of interstitial water, IWCTU, referred to final chronic values, FCVs) and for multiple metals [∑(IWCTU)j, with j varying from 1 to 5 and corresponding to the trace metals: Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn] with depth.


[1] Z. Yang, Y. Wang, Z. Shen, J. Niu, Z. Tang, Distribution and speciation of heavy metals in sediments from the mainstream, tributaries, and lakes of the Yangtze River catchment of Wuhan, China, J. Hazard. Mater. 166 (2009) 1186-1194.

[2] N. Zheng, Q. Wang, Z. Liang, D. Zheng, Characterization of heavy metal concentrations in the sediments of three freshwater rivers in Huludao City, Northeast China, Environ. Pollut. 154 (2008) 135-142.

[3] X. Hang, H. Wang, J. Zhou, C. Du, X. Chen, Characteristics and accumulation of heavy metals in sediments originated from an electroplating plant, J. Hazard. Mater. 163 (2009) 922-930.

[4] S.M. Sakan, D.S. �or�evic, D.D. Manojlovic, P.S. Predrag, Assessment of heavy metal pollutants accumulation in the Tisza river sediments, J. Environ. Manage. 90 (2009) 3382-3390.

[5] M.F. Le Cloarec, P.H. Bonte, L. Lestel, I. Lef�vre, S. Ayrault, Sedimentary record of metal contamination in the Seine River during the last century, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, In Press, Corrected Proof, doi:10.1016/j.pce.2009.02.003.

[6] J.J. Vicente-Martorell, M.D. Galindo-Ria�o, M. Garc�a-Vargas, M.D. Granado-Castro, Bioavailability of heavy metals monitoring water, sediments and fish species from a polluted estuary, J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2009) 823-836.

[7] P. Rath, U.C. Panda, D. Bhatta, K.C. Sahu, Use of sequential leaching, mineralogy, morphology and multivariate statistical technique for quantifying metal pollution in highly polluted aquatic sediments-A case study: Brahmani and Nandira Rivers, India, J. Hazard. Mater. 163 (2009) 632-644.

[8] S. Olivares-Rieumont, D. de la Rosa, L. Lima, D.W. Graham, K. D' Alessandro, J. Borroto, F. Mart�nez, J. S�nchez, Assessment of heavy metal levels in Almendares River sediments-Havana City, Cuba, Water Res. 39 (2005) 3945-3953.

[9] P.S. Harikumar, U.P. Nasir, Ecotoxicological impact assessment of heavy metals in core sediments of a tropical estuary, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 73 (2010) 1742-1747.

[10] A. Evenset, G.N. Christensen, J. Carroll, A. Zaborska, U. Berger, D. Herzke, D. Gregor, Historical trends in persistent organic pollutants and metals recorded in sediment from Lake Ellasj�en, Bj�rn�ya, Norwegian Arctic, Environ. Pollut. 146 (2007) 196-205.

[11] J.R. Viguri, M.J. Irabien, I. Yusta, J. Soto, J. G�mez, P. Rodriguez, M. Martinez-Madrid, J.A. Irabien, A. Coz, Physico-chemical and toxicological characterization of the historic estuarine sediments: A multidisciplinary approach, Environ. Int. 33 (2007) 436-444.

[12] A. Lepland, T.J. Andersen, A. Lepland, H.P.H. Arp, E. Alve, G.D. Breedveld, A. Rindby, Sedimentation and chronology of heavy metal pollution in Oslo harbor, Norway, Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2010) 1512-1522.

[13] N. Cukrov, S. Franciskovic-Bilinski, B. Hlaca, D. Barisic, A recent history of metal accumulation in the sediments of Rijeka harbor, Adriatic Sea, Croatia, Marine Pollution Bulletin In Press, Corrected Proof, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.08.020.

[14] H. Zhang, B. Shan, Historical records of heavy metal accumulation in sediments and the relationship with agricultural intensification in the Yangtze-Huaihe region, China, Sci. Total Environ. 399 (2008) 113-120.

[15] M. Chatterjee, E.V. Silva Filho, S.K. Sarkar, S.M. Sella, A. Bhattacharya, K.K. Satpathy, M.V.R. Prasad, S. Chakraborty, B.D. Bhattacharya, Distribution and possible source of trace elements in the sediment cores of a tropical macrotidal estuary and their ecotoxicological significance, Environ. Int. 33 (2007) 346-356.

[16] A. Boughriet, N. Proix, G. Billon, P. Recourt, B. Ouddane, Environmental impacts of heavy metal discharges from a smelter in De�le-canal sediments (Northern France): concentration levels and chemical distribution, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 180 (2007) 83-95.

[17] A. Boughriet, P. Recourt, N. Proix, G. Billon, M. Leermakers, J.C. Fischer, B. Ouddane, Fractionation of anthropogenic lead and zinc in De�le river sediments, Environ. Chem. 4 (2007) 114-122.

[18] L. Lesven, B. Lourino-Cabana, G. Billon, N. Proix, P. Recourt, B. Ouddane, J.C. Fischer, A. Boughriet, Water-quality diagnosis and metal distribution in a strongly polluted zone of De�le river (northern France), Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 198 (2009) 31-44.

[19] L. Lesven, B. Lourino-Cabana, G. Billon, P. Recourt, B. Ouddane, O. Mikkelsen, A. Boughriet, On metal diagenesis in contaminated sediments of De�le river (northern France), Appl. Geochem. 25 (2010) 1361-1373.

[20] B. Lourino-Cabana, L. Lesven, G. Billon, N. Proix, P. Recourt, B. Ouddane, J.C. Fischer, A. Boughriet, Impacts of Metal Contamination in Calcareous Waters of De�le River (France): Water Quality and Thermodynamic Studies on Metallic Mobility, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 206 (2010) 187-201.

[21] N. Vdovic, G. Billon, C. Gabelle, J.-L. Potdevin, Remobilization of metals from slag and polluted sediments (Case Study: The canal of the De�le River, northern France), Environ. Pollut. 141 (2006) 359-369.

[22] D.D. MacDonald, C.G. Ingersoll, T.A. Berger, Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39 (2000) 20-31.

[23] E.R. Long, D.D. MacDonald, C.G. Severn, C.B. Hong, Classifying probabilities of acute toxicity in marine sediments with empirically derived sediment quality guidelines, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 (2000) 2598-2601.

[24] USEPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria-Correction, Office of Water 4304, EPA 822-Z-99-001, 1999.

[25] C.G. Ingersoll, D.D. MacDonald, N. Wang, J.L. Crane, L.J. Field, P.S. Haverland, N.E. Kemble, R.A. Lindskoog, C. Severn, D.E. Smorong, Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 41 (2001) 8-21.

[26] AEP, Surface Water Quality Guidelines for Use in Alberta, Alberta Environmental Protection, Edmonton, Canada, 1999, pp. 20.

[27] T. Sterckeman, T. Douay, N. Proix, H. Fournier, Vertical distribution of Cd, Pb and Zn in soils near smelters in the North of France, Environ. Pollut. 107 (2000) 377-389.

[28] T. Sterckeman, F. Douay, N. Proix, H. Fourrier, E. Perdrix, Assessment of the contamination of cultivated soils by eighteen trace elements around smelters in the North of France, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 135 (2002) 173-194.

[29] T. Sterckeman, F. Douay, D. Baize, H. Fourrier, N. Proix, C. Schvartz, Trace elements in soils developed in sedimentary materials from Northern France, Geoderma 136 (2006) 912-926.

[30] H.E. Allen, G. Fu, B. Deng, Analysis of acid volatile sulfide (AVS) and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) for the estimation of potential toxicity in aquatic sediments, Environ. Tox. Chem. 12 (1993) 1441-1454.

[31] J. Leventhal, C. Taylor, Comparison of methods to determine degree of pyritization, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54 (1990) 2621-2625.

[32] M.A. Huerta-Diaz, J.W. Morse, A quantitative method for determination of trace metal concentrations in sedimentary pyrite, Mar. Chem. 29 (1990) 119-144.

[33] M.A. Huerta-Diaz, J.W. Morse, Pyritization of trace metals in anoxic sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56 (1992) 2681-2702.

[34] G.W. Luther-III, C.E. Reimers, D.B. Nuzzio, D. Lovalvo, In situ deployment of voltammetric, potentiometric and amperometric microelectrodes from a ROV to determine O2, Mn, Fe, S(-2) and pH in porewaters., Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 4352-4356.

[35] G. Billon, G�ochimie des m�taux et du soufre dans les s�diments des estuaires de la Seine et de l'Authie, Universit� des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France, 2001, pp. 206.

[36] G. M�ller, Die Schwermetallbelastung der Sedimente des Neckars und seiner Nebenflusse: eine Bestandsaufnahme, Chem. Ztg. 105 (1981) 157-164.

[37] J.M. Martin, M. Whitfield, The signification of the River Input of Chemical Elements to the Ocean, C.S. Wong, E. Boyle, K.W. Bruland, J.D. Burton and E.D. Goldberg (Ed.) Trace Metals in Sea Water, Plenum Press, New York, 1983, pp. 265-296.

[38] J.P. Gustafsson, Visual MINTEQ, version 2.40b, http://www.lwr.kth.se/English/OurSoftware/vminteq/, last assessed 30th November 2010.

[39] D.M. DiToro, J.D. Mahony, D.J. Hansen, K.J. Scott, A.R. Carlson, G.T. Ankley, Acid volatile sulfide predicts the acute toxicity of Cd and Ni in sediments, Environ. Sci. Technol. 26 (1992) 96-101.

[40] C. Van Griethuysen, J. Van Baren, E.T.H.M. Peeters, A.A. Koelmans, Trace metal availability and effects on benthic community structure in floodplain lakes, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004) 668-681.

[41] J.-S. Lee, J.-H. Lee, Influence of acid volatile sulfides and simultaneously extracted metals on the bioavailability and toxicity of a mixture of sediment-associated Cd, Ni, and Zn to polychaetes Neanthes arenaceodentata, Sci. Total Environ. 338 (2005) 229-241.

[42] H.J. De Lange, C. Van Griethuysen, A.A. Koelmans, Sampling method, storage and pretreatment of sediment affect AVS concentrations with consequences for bioassay responses, Environ. Pollut. 151 (2008) 243-251.

[43] D.M. DiToro, J.D. Mahony, D.J. Hansen, K.J. Scott, M.B. Hicks, S.M. Mayr, M.S. Redmond, Toxicity of Cd in sediments : the role of AVS, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9 (1990) 1487-1502.

[44] D.C. Cooper, J.W. Morse, Extractibility of metal sulfide minerals in acidic solutions : application to environmental studies of trace metal contamination within anoxic sediments, Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 1076-1078.

[45] G.T. Ankley, Evaluation of metal/acid volatile sulfide relationships in the prediction of metal bioaccumulation by benthic macroinvertebrates, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 (1996) 2138-2146.

[46] D. Rickard, J.W. Morse, Acid volatile sulfide (AVS), Mar. Chem. 97 (2005) 141-197.

[47] K.C. Yu, L.J. Tsai, S.H. Chen, S.T. Ho, Correlation analyses binding behavior of heavy metals with sediment matrices, Water Res. 35 (2001) 2417-2428.

[48] D.E. Howard, R.D. Evans, Acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) in a seasonally anoxic mesotrophic lake: Seasonal and spatial changes in sediment AVS, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12 (1993) 1051-1057.

[49] C. van Griethuysen, H.J. de Lange, M. van den Heuij, S.C. de Bies, F. Gillissen, A.A. Koelmans, Temporal dynamics of AVS and SEM in sediment of shallow freshwater floodplain lakes, Appl. Geochem. 21 (2006) 632-642.

[50] C. van Griethuysen, M. Luitwieler, J. Joziasse, A.A. Koelmans, Temporal variation of trace metal geochemistry in floodplain lake sediment subject to dynamic hydrological conditions, Environ. Pollut. 137 (2005) 281-294.

[51] W.J. Berry, D.J. Hansen, J.D. Mahony, D.L. Robson, D.M. Di Toro, B.P. Shipley, B. Rogers, J.M. Corbin, W.S. Boothman, Predicting the toxicity of metal-spiked laboratory sediments using acid- volatile sulfide and interstitial water normalizations, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 (1996) 2067-2079.

[52] USEPA, Methods for collection, storage and manipulation of sediments for chemical and toxicological analyses: technical manual, EPA-823-B-01-002, Office of Science & Technology, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., 2001.

[53] USEPA, The incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States (National Sediment Quality Survey), EPA-823-R-04-007, Office of Science & Technology, Washington, D.C., 2004.

[54] G.T. Ankley, D.M. Di Toro, D.J. Hansen, W.J. Berry, Technical basis and proposal for deriving sediment quality criteria for metals, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 (1996) 2056-2066.

[55] T. Fang, X. Li, G. Zhang, Acid volatile sulfide and simultaneously extracted metals in the sediment cores of the Pearl River Estuary, South China, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 61 (2005) 420-431.

[56] G.T. Ankley, G.L. Phipps, E.N. Leonard, D.A. Benoit, V.R. Mattson, P.A. Kosian, A.M. Cotter, J.R. Dierkes, D.J. Hansen, J.D. Mahony, Acid-volatile sulfide as a factor mediating cadmium and nickel bioavailability in contaminated sediments, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10 (1991) 1299-1307.

[57] K.-C. Yu, L.-J. Tsai, S.-H. Chen, S.-T. Ho, Chemical binding of heavy metals in anoxic river sediments, Water Res. 35 (2001) 4086-4094.

[58] C.E. Pesch, D.J. Hansen, W.S. Boothman, W.J. Berry, J.D. Mahony, The role of acid-volatile sulfide and interstitial water metal concentrations in determining bioavailability of cadmium and nickel from contaminated sediments to the marine polychaete Neanthes arenaceodentata, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14 (1995) 129-141.

[59] K. Liber, D.J. Call, T.P. Markee, K.L. Schmude, M.D. Balcer, F.W. Whiteman, G.T. Ankley, Effects of acid-volatile sulfide on zinc bioavailability and toxicity to benthic macroinvertebrates: A spiked-sediment field experiment, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 (1996) 2113-2125.

[60] E.N. Leonard, G.T. Ankley, R.A. Hoke, Evaluation of metals in marine and freshwater surficial sediments from the environmental monitoring and assessment program relative to proposed sediment quality criteria for metals, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 (1996) 2221-2232.

[61] P.M. Chapman, F. Wang, C. Janssen, G. Persoone, H.E. Allen, Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: Binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55 (1998) 2221-2243.

[62] G.A. Van den Berg, J.P.G. Loch, L.M. Van der Heijdt, J.J.G. Zwolsman, Vertical distribution of acid-volatile sulfide and simultaneously extracted metals in a recent sedimentation area of the river meuse in the Netherlands, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998) 758-763.

[63] M. Prica, B. Dalmacija, S. Roncevic, D. Krcmar, M. Becelic, A comparison of sediment quality results with acid volatile sulfide (AVS) and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) ratio in Vojvodina (Serbia) sediments, Sci. Total Environ. 389 (2008) 235-244.

[64] A. Tessier, P.G.C. Campbell, M. Bisson, Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals, Anal. Chem. 51 (1979) 844-851.

[65] M. Kersten, U. F�rstner, Chemical fraction of heavy metals in anoxic estuarine and coastal sediments, Water Sci. Technol. 18 (1986) 121-130.

[66] G. Rauret, J.F. Lopez-Sanchez, A. Sahuquillo, E. Barahona, M. Lachica, A.M. Ure, C.M. Davidson, A. Gomez, D. L�ck, J. Bacon, M. Yli-Halla, H. Muntau, P. Quevauviller, Application of a modified BCR sequential extraction (three steps) procedure for the determination of extractable trace metals contents in a sewage sluge amended soil reference material (CRM 483), complemented by a three-year stability study of acetic and EDTA extractable metal content, J. Environ. Monit. 2 (2000) 228-233.

[67] A.M. Ure, P. Quevauviller, H. Muntau, B. Griepink, Speciation of heavy metals in solids and harmonization of extraction techniques undertaken under the auspices of the BCR of the Commission of the European Communities, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 51 (1993) 135-151.

[68] A.M. Casas, E.A. Crecelius, Relationship between acid volatile sulfide and the toxicity of zinc, lead and copper in marine sediments, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 13 (1994) 529-536.

[69] J.A. McGrath, J.A. Paquin, D.M. DiToro, Use of the SEM and AVS approach in predicting metal toxicity in sediments, Fact sheet 10 on Environmental Risk Assessment. International Council on Mining and Metals, London, UK, 2002, pp. 7.

[70] H.J. De Lange, J. De Jonge, P.J. Den Besten, J. Oosterbaan, E.T.H.M. Peeters, Sediment pollution and predation affect structure and production of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in the Rhine-Meuse delta, The Netherlands, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 23 (2004) 557-579.

[71] H.J. De Lange, Carrying capacity of moderately polluted freshwater sediments for benthic invertebrates. Final Report (in Dutch), Wageningen University/RIZA, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2005.

[72] USEPA, Procedures for the derivation of equilibrium partitioning sediment benchmarks (ESBs) for the protection of benthic organisms: Metals mixtures (cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver and zinc), EPA-600-R-02-011, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.

[73] E.R. Long, D.D. MacDonald, Perspective: recommended uses of empirically derived sediment quality guidelines for marine and estuarine ecosystems, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 4 (1998) 1019-1039.

[74] W. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Wen, H. Tang, The application of preliminary sediment quality criteria to metal contamination in the Le An river, Environ. Pollut. 105 (1999) 355-366.

[75] W.X. Liu, R.M. Coveney, J.L. Chen, Environmental quality assessment on a river system polluted by mining activities, Appl. Geochem. 18 (2003) 749-764.

[76] C. Gobeil, N. Silverberg, B. Sundby, D. Cossa, Cadmium diagenesis in Laurentian Trough sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51 (1987) 589-596.

[77] T.J. Shaw, J.M. Gieskes, R.A. Jahnke, Early diagenesis in differing depositional environments: the response of transition metals in porewater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54 (1990) 1233-1246.

[78] A.M. Gavriil, M.O. Angelidis, Metal diagenesis in a shallow semi-enclosed marine system in the Aegean Sea, Greece, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 70 (2006) 487-498.

[79] L.J.A. Gerringa, Aerobic degradation of organic matter and the mobility of Cu, Cd, Ni, Pb, Zn, Fe and Mn in marine sediment slurries, Mar. Chem. 29 (1990) 355-374.

[80] J.F. Gaillard, C. Jeandel, G. Michard, E. Nicolas, D. Renard, Interstitial water chemistry of Villefranche Bay sediments: trace metal diagenesis, Mar. Chem. 18 (1986) 233-247.

[81] R. Luff, A. Moll, Seasonal dynamics of the North Sea sediments using a three dimensional coupled sediment-water model system, Cont. Shelf Res. 24 (2004) 1099-1127.

[82] S. Sevin�, N.F. Spycher, T.R. Ginn, R.K. Sani, B. Peyton, Biogeochemical reactive-diffusive transport of heavy metals in Lake Coeur d'Alene sediments, Appl. Geochem. 22 (2007) 2569-2594.

[83] H.B. Yin, C.X. Fan, S.M. Ding, L. Zhang, J.C. Zhong, Geochemistry of iron, sulfur and related heavy metals in metal-polluted Taihu Lake sediments, Pedosphere 18 (2008) 564-573.

[84] P.N. Froelich, G.P. Klinkhammer, M.L. Bender, N.A. Lurdtke, G.R. Heath, D. Cullen, P. Dauphin, D. Hammond, B. Hartman, V. Maynard, Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 43 (1979) 1075-1090.

[85] W. Stumm, J.J. Morgan, Aquatic Chemistry, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.

[86] R. Chester, Marine Geochemistry, Unwin Hyman Ltd, London, 1990.


Search more related documents:RESULTS
Download Document:RESULTS

Recent Documents:

Set Home | Add to Favorites

All Rights Reserved Powered by Free Document Search and Download

Copyright © 2011
This site does not host pdf,doc,ppt,xls,rtf,txt files all document are the property of their respective owners. complaint#downhi.com